[Osmf-talk] [OSM-talk] Modus operandi of the board

Simon Poole simon at poole.ch
Wed Oct 22 11:53:46 UTC 2014


because they are two years old and there is a formal procedure to
present accounts to the owners of the company at the GM at which asking
questions is to the benefit of all and could potentially have some
consequences, -that has already happened-. Once that opportunity has
passed, well it has passed.

You further completely ignore that I actually -answered- Martins
questions and did not snub him at all, it is simply an academic exercise
at this point in time.


Am 22.10.2014 13:40, schrieb Andy Allan:
> On 22 October 2014 12:20, Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch> wrote:
>> Note: the proper place to have asked the questions would have been
>> before or at the the GM in Birmingham when these figures were formally
>> presented.
> Why on earth would you say this? This is a perfectly "proper place" to
> ask questions about the OSMF accounts - to suggest otherwise is simply
> to snub someone for showing an interest.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20141022/5715ceea/attachment.sig>

More information about the osmf-talk mailing list