[Osmf-talk] seat rotation

Steve Coast steve at asklater.com
Thu Oct 23 14:34:23 UTC 2014

My memory is it's based on who's been there the longest so it's not exactly random.


> On Oct 23, 2014, at 7:05 AM, Richard Weait <richard at weait.com> wrote:
> I'm in favour of the current seat-rotation in the board, in which ~1/3
> of seat are up for each election but this method can be improved.
> I am in favour of declaring the seats to be in three otherwise equal
> groups, say "A", "B", and "C", in which the seats have given
> expiration dates.  All of group "A" at one election all of group B at
> the next, etc. This will add clarity to who has a mandate until when.
> The past habit of the board deciding internally who should step down
> when, possibly by drawing straws seems weird to me.
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk

More information about the osmf-talk mailing list