[Osmf-talk] Reaching out and diversity (Was: Re: AGM and board elections)
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Sun Sep 28 18:58:59 UTC 2014
Robert,
I'd like to ask a provocative question here:
On 09/28/2014 07:03 PM, Robert Soden wrote:
> It seems like this is an opportunity for the Board of the
> OSM Foundation to take a leadership role, show that it is a relevant
> institution, and develop a process whereby the ranges of opinions at
> play here can be heard and some way forward can be found.
If the board devised a way to hear opinions, including those that prefer
to speak in private, and if it turned out that a majority of members of
the OSMF would prefer the organisation to concentrate on running servers
instead of trying to encourage diversity - would that then mean that the
members are obviously wrong, just trying to defend their privilege, and
in need of replacement?
Is there even interest in a "range of opinions", or has the only correct
opinion already been laid down?
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
More information about the osmf-talk
mailing list