[Osmf-talk] Hiring help for OSMF administrative tasks

[Kathleen Danielson]

Simon,

Please do not "pull rank" or assert your dominance over me by reminding
everyone of how long you've been involved in OSM. The length of time that
you have been involved in the project does not make my opinions,
viewpoints, or contributions less valid. I was elected to the board, just
as you were. (Which doesn't really make either of us more of a voice of
authority, incidentally). Attempting to make my contributions seem less
legitimate by reminding everyone that you were here first is a silencing
technique, and it's inappropriate.

As for your dismissive question, Frederik has already addressed it.

Kathleen


On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch> wrote:

>
>
>
> the problem is that it is in the 6 years or so that I've been active in
> OSM, this is the first I've heard of the paperwork/admin load on the
> board being significant or even a topic (not to mention hours per week).
>
> Things not being done has been a recurring topic, but not doing
> something typically takes zero hours per week.
>
> Given the above, I think we would all like to hear what the board has
> changed that the paperwork load has gone from essentially zero to being
> an issue and not be brushed off with a not-well disguised "it's none of
> your business".
>
> Yes there are other workloads that I've already mentioned that are
> significant, and I'm open to ways to approach that (for example like
> having a real lawyer on the LWG).
>
> Simon
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20150311/babc4c84/attachment.html>