[Osmf-talk] OSMF Transparency report

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

2016-12-05 11:11 GMT+01:00 Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org>:

> sometimes even remove something that we wouldn't legally be required to.



This sounds somehow interesting. Could you explain in short, what kind of
cases this sentence was about? How often does this occur?

Another question in the context of takedown requests: How many of these
come from official public entities and how many are from private entities
(especially: have there been any from public entities, and from which and
what).

Does British law consent you to speak about these cases or are there
regulations that prevent you from openly informing the members of such
incidents (like "gag orders" in the US)?

Is OSMF seeking legal advice in case such incidents occur and has it
already happened in the past?

Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20161205/2be230e7/attachment.html>