[Osmf-talk] Budget for 2016

Kate Chapman kate at maploser.com
Mon May 2 15:35:28 UTC 2016

Hi Mark,

Personally I don't actually think that people are more interested in
donating for hardware. Since we have only done fundraising for hardware
however I was curious to get additional opinions.



On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Mark Obrembalski <mark at obrembalski.de>

> Am 01.05.2016 um 21:43 schrieb Kate Chapman:
> Would individuals be interested in contributing to a yearly fundraising
>> campaign if it was not just for hardware?
> Oh, and for a more general remark: Why do you expect that individuals (or
> corporations) are especially keen to donate if their contributions go into
> hardware? Sure the particular purpose of a contribution can be crucial for
> getting donations, as a member of an environmental organisation I know it
> is easier to find donors for the protection of a particularily cute animal
> species than for an ugly one or some more abstract cause (which very well
> might help the cute species, too). But I don't think that hardware can stir
> the emotions of most people in a way a young seal or a beautiful butterfly
> can.
> Mark
> --
> falls es militärisch dringend erforderlich ist, dürfen NATO Soldaten
> auch mit dem Fahrrad in der Fußgängerzone fahren...
> [Martin Koppenhöfer legt in der OSM-Mailingliste de-talk die StVO aus]
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20160502/c8e57cd4/attachment.html>

More information about the osmf-talk mailing list