[Osmf-talk] May 2017 use of Code Of Conduct (CoC) for Membership control in HOT US Inc internal governance

john whelan jwhelan0112 at gmail.com
Fri Dec 1 23:07:00 UTC 2017


I was just after the board members and note they are a diverse bunch and
not predominantly American which was the concern.

Thanks John



On 1 December 2017 at 17:37, Pete Masters <pedrito1414 at googlemail.com>
wrote:

> Hang on! I misread that! Of course Dale isn't the only member from the US
> ;)
>
> Only board member, though...
>
> Members are listed here: https://www.hotosm.org/voting-members
>
> Cheers,
>
> Pete
>
> On 1 Dec 2017 22:34, "Pete Masters" <pedrito1414 at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi John, I think it's just Dale...
>>
>> Pete
>>
>> On 1 Dec 2017 22:10, "john whelan" <jwhelan0112 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The other very interesting point would be how many members / percent of
>>> the HOT board hold US citizenship or have worked in the US on some sort of
>>> work permit.
>>>
>>> Thanks John
>>>
>>> On 1 December 2017 at 16:57, Christoph Hormann <chris_hormann at gmx.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Friday 01 December 2017, Dale Kunce wrote:
>>>> > [...]
>>>> > You and Sev bullied the HOT community for years, now subjecting
>>>> > others to the same bullying all to try and settle old scores. [...]
>>>> > Your vitriol and constant accusations are devoid of fact
>>>>
>>>> > <https://www.hotosm.org/hot_code_of_conduct>.
>>>>
>>>> I am trying to understand the HOT culture and the way HOT applies its
>>>> CoC for the purpose of evaluating the desire expressed - among others -
>>>> by HOT members to establish a presumably similar CoC for the OSMF with
>>>> presumably similar ways of applying it.
>>>>
>>>> For this purpose i would like to know if Dale's mail, specifically the
>>>> statements cited above, would be considered to be in violation of this
>>>> CoC and why they are/are not.  In a similar way of course i would also
>>>> like to know if Nicolas' mails today, in particular the first one,
>>>> would or would not be in violation of said CoC (the cited statements
>>>> above indicate that they appear to be considered as such by Dale -
>>>> though at the moment i do not quite understand what the reason for this
>>>> assessment is).
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Christoph Hormann
>>>> http://www.imagico.de/
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> osmf-talk mailing list
>>>> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> osmf-talk mailing list
>>> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20171201/d246a658/attachment.html>


More information about the osmf-talk mailing list