[Osmf-talk] Candidate response: multiple threads
jwhelan0112 at gmail.com
Sat Dec 2 16:07:33 UTC 2017
Could you remind me of your definition of the word leader? and how would a
board made up of leaders be better than a different mix?
It would seem to me that a board made up of leaders would have need of
professional assistance to save being led in different directions by
different leaders but that is my understanding of the word and may not be
the modern interpretation.
On 2 December 2017 at 10:18, Heather Leson <heatherleson at gmail.com> wrote:
> Over the past few days, there have been multiple email threads about HOT,
> Code of Conduct, as well as directly about me and my role. Thank you for
> the discussion and the questions. I do agree that dialogue and being open
> to points of view are important.
> I am a member of HOT, a former Board member, and a current proud supporter
> of HOT and OSM. As well, I do have other fine qualities.The OSMF membership
> does have a right to determine if I am the candidate they seek. We are
> individuals before we are our affiliations. HOT is one part of OSM. There
> are other NGOs that connect to OSMF. There are many people on this list who
> may work for those NGOs, or who previously worked at them. There are many
> people who contribute to OSM on a myriad of topics from bike trails to
> public toilets. The incredible community, membership, supporters, donors,
> and board of HOT deserve more than to be discredited for their efforts. As
> I said before - it is an open election. It is an asset that I have
> experience and patience to keep trying in a positive, forward-thinking
> manner. And, it is the choice of members, to agree or disagree.
> The activities of the HOT board, specifically my contribution, were put
> into question. It is true that there are differences of interests,
> policies, and practices. I stand by our decisions to be accountable to the
> HOT staff, donors, supporters, members, volunteers, and fellow board
> members. This is well documented within the HOT organization and via the
> membership and community mailing lists. The membership made decisions, the
> board made decisions, and Executive Director(s) made decisions. There is
> always room to improve your governance and leadership. We worked hard to
> support the mission and the people involved.
> The HOT board, as you read, managed a many difficult issues. We procured
> help from a leader in facilitation and organizational development. Allen
> Gunn of Aspiration Tech, who previously supported Tor, Greenpeace, Mozilla,
> and other large open communities. In addition to running the HOT in-person
> board meeting one year, he volunteered his time to help us work through
> some of these items. I am thankful that he tried to help us. OSM and OSMF
> are too important to not try to work through issues. Sometimes we need
> Regarding Code of Conduct, we did research on best practices across open
> source communities, which informed the Governance Working Group of HOT. You
> can read more about this on the links on the Questions page and in my
> candidacy statement. A code of conduct only works if there is a process
> around it and people to support it. If OSMF did institute one, I know that
> there are many talented people here who would do their best to make good
> judgements in consultation with each other and you.
> Just a reminder that I am a volunteer and person. It seems to me that
> anyone can and should try to be a leader, irrespective of their
> affiliation. These notes may be a deterrent to those who might consider
> standing for the OSMF board or other activities. I hope that whoever you
> are that you reconsider. It is not exactly easy to have to wake up to all
> these emails and documents dissecting an organization and individuals that
> I care about. I can’t say that I enjoy reading my character and volunteer
> contribution be questioned to such a degree on a mailing list. But, I can
> only hope that we move to a better place as a global community.
> Have a good weekend,
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the osmf-talk