[Osmf-talk] statistics from the membership drive
chris_hormann at gmx.de
Sun Dec 3 18:04:25 UTC 2017
On Sunday 03 December 2017, Kate Chapman wrote:
> > By the way the non-proportional geographic representation is likely
> > a self emphasizing problem. If an under-represented group does not
> > feel represented in an organization like the OSMF members of this
> > group will feel less inclined to participate in that organization.
> Could you elaborate a bit more on how you would see this working?
> What would define the geographic representation? Population, number
> of mappers, something else?
I think i said this before but thanks for asking, this is important to
be clear about.
Me emphasizing about the importance of proportional geographic
representation is about representation of the OSM community (that is
primarily the mappers although it in principle includes everyone active
in the community in some form) in the OSMF membership. I think a
roughly proportional representation is fundamental for the legitimacy
of the OSMF in representing the project.
Note with geographic representation i primarily mean cultural
representation. Strictly speaking the numbers Michael presented are
about the country of residence and it is fairly obvious that living in
a certain country does not necessarily make you a good representative
of the country's local OSM community. Likewise someone living abroad
can still be a fairly valuable voice for the culture of his/her country
The question of a proportional representation of the world population in
the OSM community is a different matter and something i think can
better be discussed in a larger framework, not just among the OSMF
More information about the osmf-talk