[Osmf-talk] Treasurer's report for 2017 AGM
jwhelan0112 at gmail.com
Fri Dec 8 23:10:33 UTC 2017
I'm quite comfortable with the idea of waiting until the server is settled
in and working smoothly before announcing the donation.
The details will come out eventually and the last thing a donor would like
to see is publicity about a new server they had donated wasn't performing
I suspect there are too many conspiracy theories floating around at the
On 8 Dec 2017 5:38 pm, "Christoph Hormann" <chris_hormann at gmx.de> wrote:
> On Friday 08 December 2017, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> > There is no malicious intent. The timing is entirely coincidental.
> I did not say there was malicious intent.
> But please don't tell me the timing is entirely coincidental if it is
> published a day before the AGM - that is frankly insulting.
> > We
> > are not trying to obfuscate anything. We are looking to serve the
> > best interest, needs and requirements of OSM, and from time to time
> > that means accommodating a donor organization as well.
> It is my understanding that formally as the board your obligation is
> foremost to the members. If you decide certain actions are in the
> interest of OSM you ultimately have to answer to the members for those
> decisions and for this to work the members need to be informed about
> Independent of that i think accepting a requirement from a donor to
> withhold information about a donation from the OSM community after it
> has been made is not in the spirit of transparency. If transparency in
> the OSMF is subordinate to financial needs and interests is somethings
> that could be worth discussing (although you can probably guess my
> opinion on the matter).
> Christoph Hormann
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the osmf-talk