[Osmf-talk] Chairperson's Report for the AGM
sfkeller at gmail.com
Tue Dec 12 14:40:05 UTC 2017
I very much miss for example a word about SotM - the past one and
perhaps a little bit about its' future!
2017-12-11 15:08 GMT+01:00 Benoit Fournier <ben.fournier at gmail.com>:
> Kate, Frederik, Mikel & OSMF members,
> I could simply quote and put '+1' on parts of previous messages: I rather
> agree with the full message by Ivo, the second and more polite attempt by
> Michael/nebulon42, the rewording by Mikel or the proposal by Nicolas.
> I will try to put it in my words though:
> I would welcome and read with great attention a yearly report --- by the
> Board or the Chairperson --- about the OSMF.
> Facts, obvious or not, should be part of this report, and highlight the main
> points of the whole year.
> Feelings, insights, perspectives, and other non factual bits, are very much
> welcome too.
> The community or freelance assistants could help but I would value more a
> report written or approved by the Board members.
> All in all, I think our Chairperson Kate's report is indeed satisfactory;
> only I would like more of it. :)
> And yes, I would like to read less of the small fights and more of the OSMF
> work and future.
> All the best,
> Benoît Fournier
> OSMF / State of the Map team
> OSM France / board member
> On 11 December 2017 at 02:28, Robert Kaiser <kairo at kairo.at> wrote:
>> nicolas chavent schrieb:
>>> Kate Chapman as the OSMF Chairperson provided the Membership *16.5 hours*
>>> prior the General Meeting with the 2017 Chairperson's report
>> FWIW, in any organization I have been part ofany uch reports were always
>> only presented *at* the meeting comparative to this AGM, not any hours (s)
>> before, and usually not in a form visible outside the meeting at all.
>> For the contents, I agree that while the board members may think the facts
>> are abvious, us as "normal" members are usually more disconnected from those
>> and therefore it's always nice to have some rehash of those and I also would
>> enjoy to see more details there in the future.
>> I also agree though that the tone of the initial email in this thread was
>> a bit harsh and we should phrase wishes like that in a more sensitive way in
>> the future, if possible.
>> osmf-talk mailing list
>> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
More information about the osmf-talk