[Osmf-talk] [HOT] [hotosm-membership] Re: Code of Conduct Reminder

Rory McCann rory at technomancy.org
Fri Dec 15 19:19:47 UTC 2017


What's wrong with each mailing list having separate, per list moderation and rules? Why not give HOT Inc moderation power of the hot@ list? If a group wants to run its group according to specific rules (within some limits), what's wrong with that?

OSMF doesn't have a global code of conduct (yet 😉), but State of the Map conferences do. Same idea.

On 15 December 2017 19:43:43 CET, Dale Kunce <dale.kunce at gmail.com> wrote:
>Just to clear the air. I misspoke in my initial post when I said the
>HOT
>CoC would be enforced on this list. I've since learned that the HOT
>list is
>not administered by HOT and thus our community crafted CoC does not
>apply
>here. Note: it does apply to all other HOT communication channels,
>including Tasking Manager, GitHub, slack, etc.
>
>As Mikel said the existing OSM Etiquette rules, however, do apply in
>this
>space.
>
>My earlier statement of asking all community members of this list to
>think
>twice about what you say on this list. This is not an effort to curb
>free
>speech but instead to build a positive collaborative space to discuss.
>
>On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Russell Deffner <
>russell.deffner at hotosm.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would prefer to participate in mailing lists that are governed by
>CoC
>> and enforced by an organized group rather than individuals.
>>
>> =Russ
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dan S [mailto:danstowell+osm at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 11:11 AM
>> To: Rafael Avila Coya
>> Cc: osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org; Mapa Nauta; hot at openstreetmap.org
>> Subject: Re: [HOT] [Osmf-talk] [hotosm-membership] Re: Code of
>Conduct
>> Reminder
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> It does seem to me that more clarity would be good here, i.e.
>slightly
>> disentangling the lines of accountability regarding the hot@ mailing
>> list.
>>
>> Mikel's response has logical sense, but it's probably not clear to
>the
>> average participant in the hot@ mailing list whether they are
>> automatically made a part of the HOT community. Whether the best
>> clarification is to have two mailing lists, or for the info page
>> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot> to make clear whether
>> it is in general governed by HOT's rules, I don't know.
>>
>> Best
>> Dan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> HOT mailing list
>> HOT at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> HOT mailing list
>> HOT at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>sent from my mobile device
>
>Dale Kunce
>http://normalhabit.com

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20171215/49709f75/attachment.html>


More information about the osmf-talk mailing list