[Osmf-talk] DWG survey on organized editing
iknowjoseph at gmail.com
Wed Oct 18 10:42:12 UTC 2017
Perhaps. Do you have any numbers?
Would you say this ended up being correct "The survey is going to be skewed
in many ways for example by higher participation from people associated
with organisations with a vested interest in paid/organized editing" ?
On 18 October 2017 at 11:40, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> 2017-10-18 12:19 GMT+02:00 Joseph Reeves <iknowjoseph at gmail.com>:
>> Simon was wrong, however: There was no higher participation from people
>> associated with paid mapping (15% of respondents), or people doing
>> organised mapping (26%). This vast majority of participants in this survey
>> did not partake in organised mapping: It's their unrepresentative
>> sentiment we see.
> 15% of paid mappers or 26% of organized mappers from my perception are
> much higher numbers compared to the proportion of paid/organized mappers to
> all mappers.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the osmf-talk