[Osmf-talk] DWG survey on organized editing

Rory McCann rory at technomancy.org
Wed Oct 18 12:49:07 UTC 2017


On 18/10/17 12:40, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2017-10-18 12:19 GMT+02:00 Joseph Reeves <iknowjoseph at gmail.com>:
>> Simon was wrong, however: There was no higher participation from
>> people associated with paid mapping (15% of respondents), or people
>> doing organised mapping (26%). This vast majority of participants in
>> this survey did not partake in organised mapping: It's their
>> unrepresentative sentiment we see.
 >
> 15% of paid mappers or 26% of organized mappers from my perception are 
> much higher numbers compared to the proportion of paid/organized mappers 
> to all mappers.

The survey asked if you were "associated with an organisation which does
paid mapping", not whether you are a paid mapper. For example if your
employer does paid mapping (but you do not), you'd have to click yes.

I think that part of the survey was poorly worded, but this is what we have.



More information about the osmf-talk mailing list