[Osmf-talk] 2018 a third episode of entryism by HOT US Inc at OSMF Board after 2015 and 2017: call 4 action (candidates/members) for a balanced OSMF Board
Christoph Hormann
chris_hormann at gmx.de
Wed Dec 12 11:23:36 UTC 2018
By the way we discussed more or less the same matter in the German
RadioOSM podcast.
Since the reaction of some to this discussion inevitably will be that a
HOT membership does not constitute a bias per se i would like to
explain a bit more context here.
To become a HOT member people need to apply and be elected - you cannot
simply sign up (like when you become an OSM mapper) or pay a fee (like
for OSMF membership). This means there is a selection process and this
selection process is based on certain criteria - not necessarily formal
criteria but de facto there are criteria imposed - either deliberately
or subconsciously - by those who make the selection.
This means while there might not be a causal relationship between HOT
membership and certain opinions on OSM and OSMF politics there
definitely is a correlation between them. Or in other words: I am
pretty sure that if all the French and German hobby mappers would apply
for HOT membership almost none of them would be accepted, largely
because - as we say in German - they lack the "Stallgeruch" of HOT.
This means that in the absence of specific statements from candidates
taking into account their HOT membership as an indicator for what view
of OSM they have is a valid and perfectly reasonable approach. Nothing
prevents candidates from distancing themselves from general HOT
positions as well as from the positions of HOT members currently on the
OSMF board if they want to emphasize their independence.
I would also like to add a bit of a warning to those who think HOT
members dominating the OSMF board is not undesirable - for example
because they think the OSMF could use more of the HOT Stallgeruch. I
already indicated this in my blog post about the elections:
http://blog.imagico.de/elections-for-the-board-of-the-openstreetmap-foundation-2018/
There is a clearly widening gap between the OSMF board and the local
hobby mapper communities that form the backbone of OSM. To those of
you who only sporadically engage with the local hobby mapper
communities like many hotties and employees of corporations in the OSM
context this is probably not readily apparent. If you'd make a poll
among mappers if they feel represented by the OSMF board the results
would probably be pretty bad and significantly worse than 2-3 years
back. Ignoring this problem when electing new board members is not a
good idea - because it would sooner or later fall back onto your feet.
Regarding the idea of Tobias for a one board member per organization
quota - this certainly would not hurt but i have my doubts about how
much effect this would have because as indicated above people just
resigning their HOT membership would not really change anything in
substance. As i have said several times before i would take a more
radical approach and say anyone with a professional relationship to OSM
(as employee or entrepreneur) and anyone with a formal position in an
organizational OSM stakeholder should be disqualified from serving on
the board. I would combine such measure with limiting the role of the
board to supervision and policy decisions and assign most executive
roles to a separate body which may include people with professional
connections to OSM but which would be supervised by the board.
--
Christoph Hormann
http://www.imagico.de/
More information about the osmf-talk
mailing list