[Osmf-talk] OSM and open data global aerial/sat images

[Rob Nickerson]

I missed a crucial word: "data".

Isn't cc-by-sa imagery ok (with cc-by-sa DATA being the problem)?

Thanks,
Rob

On 15 Jan 2018 12:46 p.m., "Rob Nickerson" <rob.j.nickerson at gmail.com>
wrote:

> John provided a link on how to access the images under Cc by sa. You have
> to go through a few steps. Have you tried and had no success?
>
> Isn't cc-by-sa imagery ok (with cc-by-sa being the problem)?
>
> Either way, thanks John for bringing this forward :-)
>
> Best,
> Rob
>
> On 15 Jan 2018 10:54 a.m., "Christoph Hormann" <chris_hormann at gmx.de>
> wrote:
>
>> On Monday 15 January 2018, John Gilmore wrote:
>> >
>> > Planet Labs has already released all their California satellite
>> > imagery under a CC-BY-SA license [...]
>>
>> Actually no - while they have claimed to have done this there is no
>> imagery actually available under such a license (if there was you would
>> be able to provide a link to the images - wouldn't you?) - a clear case
>> of openwashing.
>>
>> Besides that everyone should know that Planet Labs is a persistent OSM
>> license violator:
>>
>> https://www.planet.com/gallery/
>> https://www.planet.com/explorer/
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lacking_proper_attribution
>>
>> so any kind of cooperation between the OSMF and them is - in light of
>> this context - likely out of the question.
>>
>> --
>> Christoph Hormann
>> http://www.imagico.de/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> osmf-talk mailing list
>> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20180115/c17ae478/attachment.html>