[Osmf-talk] Next OSMF Board Meeting 2018-06-21 (Thursday) at 21:00 London time

[Martijn van Exel]

I suggested this. 

The main reason was that there are specific LC applications pending and
we didn't want to discuss those decisions specifically in public.
I think you both have a fair point though. We can discuss the general
thinking about criteria for becoming a LC in the public part of the
meeting. I would actually welcome input from the membership about this.
The main points of discussion are, to my mind: how established must a
local organization be to be eligible to become a local chapter, how can
we measure this as objectively as possible, and (this has come up
before, in the LC applications of Belgium and Italy) how to handle
applications from organizations that have a broader scope than just OSM.--
Martijn van Exel
Secretary, OpenStreetMap Foundation



On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, at 15:53, Douglas Ssebaggala wrote:
> +1 especially on item 2
> 
> But generally, with due respect fine with the decision of holding
> these two in n a closed session if that's the decision of the board.> 
> Good enough results are usually openly shared... 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018, 12:49 AM Michael Reichert <osm-
> ml at michreichert.de> wrote:>> Dear board,
>> 
>> Am 20.06.2018 um 12:26 schrieb Dorothea Kazazi:
>> > The next monthly recurring board meeting is this Thursday, 21st of>> > June 2018, at 21:00 London time.
>> > https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OSMF+board+meeting+-+June+2018&iso=20180621T21&p1=136&ah=1%2021:0>> > 
>> > We use Mumble https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mumble
>> > 
>> > The preliminary agenda is at
>> > https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Board/Minutes/2018-06-21
>> > The draft minutes of the last Mumble meeting are at
>> > https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Board/Minutes/2018-05-24
>> 
>> The closed part of the meeting contains two items:
>> 
>> (1) Discussion of hosting and GDPR technical preparation
>> 
>> (2) Processing Local Chapter applications from countries where it is>>     difficult to show an established track record of activities
>>     building>>     and supporting the OSM community
>> 
>> Could you please go a bit more into detail and explain why
>> they cannot>> be discussed in the open? I have difficulties to imagine why
>> sensitive>> personal information could be affected by item 2.
>> 
>> Best regards
>> 
>> Michael
>> 
>> -- 
>> Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt.
>> (Mailinglisten>> ausgenommen)
>> I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> osmf-talk mailing list
>> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20180620/1856d93c/attachment.html>