[Osmf-talk] OSM & LoRa LPWAN
Tom Hughes
tom at compton.nu
Mon Sep 3 07:27:53 UTC 2018
I doubt anything mentioned on that site will be of any use on a
connection whose speed is measured in bytes/minute.
Then again I doubt there is any way to do online routing over
such a connection.
Tom
On 03/09/18 07:37, Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote:
> Good morning Plnr. Md. Shahriar Alam,
>
> If it was not done already, the website https://switch2osm.org could be
> recommended to Ebykes.
>
> Best regards,
> Oleksiy
>
> On 03.09.18 07:08, Md Shahriar Alam wrote:
>> Good day Everybody! A Ebykes service company of New Zealand wanted to
>> use OSM and they have asked me about some bandwidth related issues
>> with OSM. What should be the answer of their below Questions If
>> someone of you know this:
>>
>> " We're taking a holistic approach that we believe will dramatically
>> improve eBikes. We're doing this by drilling down into all the key
>> components, to identify better ways of doing things.
>>
>> As we're developing our own electric motor package and control system,
>> I'm interested in adding features which could be enabled by accessing
>> a low cost & power IoT network. Hence, I'm trying to figure out which
>> LPWAN technology suits our applications best and whether these
>> networks offer sufficient bandwidth to that offering OpenStreetMap
>> navigation via the bikes LCD touchscreen would not simply cause a lot
>> of frustration!
>>
>> We've been trying to find out the bandwidth requirements of OSM but so
>> far I've been unsuccessful. Hence, I thought I'd see if I could find
>> someone associated with OSM with the knowledge to be able to offer
>> such advice. I thought you looked like such a person! Is that
>> something you may be able to help us with?
>>
>> To give you some idea of the bandwidth of these network technologies.
>> LoRa, which is quite a common IoT network seems to be limited to 50
>> bytes every 5-10 min for both the up and down link. The network
>> operator explains that there is a difference between what is possible
>> with the network and what is recommended to get stable results in all
>> conditions, so allowing for 50 bytes enables stable results in all
>> conditions.
>>
>> The operator also suggests that the ability of their network to
>> provide map function data transfer will depend on how much data is
>> transferred, how frequently, and if it is suitable to be sent as a
>> discreet data payload."
>>
>>
>> *Thanks and Regards***
>>
>> *//**/Plnr. Md. Shahriar Alam /*
>> */| /**/Sr. Web GIS (Geographic Information System) Specialist |/*
>> /GIS Department,/
>> /Cell:+8801714130159,/
>> /
>> /
>> */| /**/Premium Instructor of Web GIS | /*/
>> /
>> /Udemy./*/
>> /*
>>
>> /
>> /
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> osmf-talk mailing list
>> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>
--
Tom Hughes (tom at compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
More information about the osmf-talk
mailing list