[Osmf-talk] OSMF Board Election - Official candidate questions now published
Simon Poole
simon at poole.ch
Sat Nov 16 12:53:51 UTC 2019
"With experience in the community/board" is not the same criteria as
disallowing current board members, who, imho, should not be trying to
influence the elections as long as they are a member.
Simon
Am 16.11.2019 um 13:49 schrieb Heather Leson:
> Simon, why would you restrict members or people with experience in the
> community/board to not ask questions?
>
> HeatherĀ
>
>
> On Sat, 16 Nov 2019, 13:36 Simon Poole, <simon at poole.ch
> <mailto:simon at poole.ch>> wrote:
>
> Michael
>
> Thanks for this.
>
> Expecting you to be doing this next time too :-): could we put a
> rule in
> place that doesn't allow questions from candidates and current board
> members?
>
> If the candidates want to jokey for position I would consider a
> town-hall or similar type of event to be more appropriate and fairer,
> instead of giving an advantage to those that get their, typically
> loaded, questions to be accepted.
>
> Simon
>
> Am 16.11.2019 um 11:04 schrieb Michael Collinson:
> > I have now produced a collated questions for candidates to answer.
> >
> >
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Foundation/AGM19/Election_to_Board
> >
> >
> > Candidates, please a rough estimate of how long it takes you and let
> > me know. This will help me or future volunteers keep it
> reasonable. My
> > particular concern is the impact on non-native English speakers.
> >
> > Thank you to all who posted questions. If you have any feedback or
> > concerns about what I have done, please do feel free to let me know
> > publicly or privately.
> >
> > --------------
> >
> > OK, that is the announcement done, but for transparency, here
> are some
> > notes on my methodology:
> >
> > I want to strike a balance between candidate's time and
> "censorship",
> > (i.e. not including everyone's questions). I also want as much as I
> > can to set a level playing field for non-native English-speaking
> > candidates and candidates from non-Western cultures.
> >
> > Last year it took candidates who responded to me at least 8 hours to
> > compile answers. Two candidates took well over that. I had some
> > thoughtful private feedback from 3 folks who had posted community
> > questions. Last year, I generalised questions as much as I could and
> > ruthlessly cut anything that was "What is your position on X"
> and not
> > clearly OSM-related. That meant I filtered out specificity and had
> > some soul-searching as to what to do with identity politics. As a
> > result of the feedback, I have tried something a bit different this
> > year: There are more very specific/complex/perhaps controversial
> > questions but I have given candidates some choice in what questions
> > they want to tackle - so I hope it is not too overwhelming. In
> > particular, there is a "What would you do?" section where I have
> taken
> > a number of questions and presented them as if there were board
> agenda
> > items.
> >
> > Last year, Dorothea put the unedited community questions below the
> > "official" set. I thought that worked very well for transparency and
> > we are repeating it this year.
> >
> > If you are curious about last year's questions, here is the link:
> >
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Foundation/AGM18/Election_to_Board#Official_set_of_questions
> >
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > osmf-talk mailing list
> > osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org>
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20191116/980e972a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20191116/980e972a/attachment.sig>
More information about the osmf-talk
mailing list