[Osmf-talk] SOTM Africa
Simon Poole
simon at poole.ch
Sun Nov 24 14:38:28 UTC 2019
The elephant in the room that Steve was referring to is that there have
been and are members of the board whose position is supported by their
employer. For a great range of "supported" from actively encouraging
standing, to it essentially being part of their employment. Somewhere in
that continuum "volunteer" loses its meaning a bit.
Simon
Am 24.11.2019 um 13:09 schrieb Allan Mustard:
> If OSM does not pay its board members, they are by definition
> volunteers.
>
> Speaking for myself, I cannot guarantee that in retirement I can
> afford on a government pension to pay out of pocket to attend SOTM
> conferences. The one thing I can offer is my time, on a voluntary basis.
>
> cheers,
> apm
>
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2019, 7:07 PM Steve Coast <steve at stevecoast.com
> <mailto:steve at stevecoast.com>> wrote:
>
> I’m confused why you think all board members are volunteers? That
> feels like a convenient fiction.
>
> Best
>
> Steve
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Jorden Verwer <jorden at verwer.express>
> *Sent:* Saturday, November 23, 2019 11:52:00 PM
> *To:* Steve Coast <steve at stevecoast.com <mailto:steve at stevecoast.com>>
> *Cc:* talk at openstreetmap org Talk <talk at openstreetmap.org
> <mailto:talk at openstreetmap.org>>; osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> <mailto:osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org> <osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> <mailto:osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org>>
> *Subject:* Re: [Osmf-talk] SOTM Africa
>
> Hello Steve,
>
> It's good to hear that you had a nice time in Ivory Coast and that
> SOTM
> Africa appears to have been a success. For me, as a passive OSMF
> member
> who only attended SOTM once and rarely participates in discussions
> outside of the AGM, I can only respect people who spend way more
> time on
> OSM than I do - and that obviously includes you. I also think it's
> generally a good idea for as many board members as possible to attend
> SOTM conferences.
>
> What I'm not so sure I agree with you on is your proposal to make
> attendance of at least one OSMF board member mandatory. The board
> consists of volunteers, and for any board member there can be very
> valid
> reasons why they can't or won't attend. As a consequence, this may
> apply
> to all board members simultaneously in some situations. What would
> the
> effect of your proposal be in such a situation? Can the planned SOTM
> conference not take place then and there? Will the board be
> penalized?
> Neither option seems to be all that desirable, so instead I'd propose
> that OSMF board member attendance be highly recommended, but not
> required.
>
> Oh, and I should probably not get involved in this, so against my
> better
> judgment I'll quote the page Christoph linked to:
> "We expect this to be the official election campaign process. We
> won't
> restrict members to continue to talk on our members' mailing list nor
> will we restrict candidates to continue discussions, but we don't
> encourage them to do so. The official answers and questions thereof
> should be what voters use to judge."
>
> Regards,
>
> Jorden
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20191124/998f053e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20191124/998f053e/attachment.sig>
More information about the osmf-talk
mailing list