[Osmf-talk] [OSM-talk] Attribution guideline status update

[Rihards]

On 31.10.19 11:04, Jeffrey Friedl wrote:
>> Nope, slippy maps still use platform native, non-OSM maps.
> 
> Is this a problem? Why is it being mentioned on an OSM mailing list? It's unrelated to OSM.
> I'm really confused why this thread exists at all.

The blog article talked about updated maps on web and mobile, and it
gave hope that slippy maps might be switching to OSM finally.

This is on OSM list as Strava does use OSM in many places, and many
contributors love seeing our work being put to good use.

I feel that you are angry about something in my email, clarifying the
situation with the OSM usage by Strava, but I honestly do not understand
what it could be.
If you are angry, could you please help me understand what did I do
wrong so I could improve in the future?

>     Jeffrey
-- 
 Rihards