[Osmf-talk] 3→4% figure source? | Re: Commitment to open communication channels
Kathleen Lu
kathleen.lu at mapbox.com
Wed Aug 19 20:33:43 UTC 2020
I think we'd all like to see the results of that survey, but it would be
more difficult to conduct. And it's not an either-or. It's not like
conducting one survey means you're prohibited from conducting the other.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 1:11 PM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 19. Aug 2020, at 18:51, Yves <ycai at mailbox.org> wrote:
> >
> > A survey could be be a good idea, though it should be conducted very
> seriously to also expose the kind of bias mentioned here along the results.
> > I think a first step would be to ask for volunteers versed in statistic
> and social science to plan this on behalf of the OSMF.
>
>
> I would be much more interested in statistical data of all users (that
> have made at least one edit), than on OpenStreetMap-Foundation member
> statistics.
> OpenStreetMap is about mapping.
>
> Cheers Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20200819/2b50dd11/attachment.htm>
More information about the osmf-talk
mailing list