[Osmf-talk] Freemap Slovakia Local Chapter application

joost schouppe joost.schouppe at gmail.com
Tue Dec 8 14:46:00 UTC 2020


Hi Frederik,

Re this bit:

> For example, we could at the very least request - even from existing
local chapters - that if ever an application gets rejected, the case
automatically forwarded to the OSMF or something like that.

We devised a rule similar to this during the Geolibres application, and
have later decided to include this in all future LCA's as well. SInce we'll
be offering "upgrading" to the new version of the LCA to the existing
applications, that would mean this rule will probably be rolled out to most
existing chapters as well.

Op vr 27 nov. 2020 om 23:09 schreef Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org>:

> Hi,
>
> On 11/27/20 21:56, Rory McCann wrote:
> > This issue has appeared at other, previous, applications.
>
> Correct. And we have asked questions and been assured that it was
> essentially a case of waving through applications.
>
> It's pretty much down to what it means in practice. In this particular
> case "a written application" can mean a membership application where you
> only fill in your name, or it can mean you need to write a page of text
> explaining why you're worthy... I cannot know, from the distance I have,
> whether "you have to submit a written application" is essentially no
> hurdle, or whether it is a barrier intended to keep away those who
> cannot make a written argument.
>
> > I think it would unfair to new LCs if we held them to a higher standard
> as was set before
>
> I do not agree with this logic. If it ever turned out we made a mistake
> in the past, we can't fix it because it would be unfair? On the
> contrary, we could then re-negotiate all existing local chapter agreements.
>
> For example, we could at the very least request - even from existing
> local chapters - that if ever an application gets rejected, the case
> automatically forwarded to the OSMF or something like that.
>
> > In addition, for the OSMF, the board currently has the right to decide
> that someone can't be an OSMF member for the first 30 days after they join.
> So the OSMF, sorta, has this rule too. I fear that ship has sailed....
>
> At least such a decision by the OSMF would be the object of public
> scrutiny...
>
> Bye
> Frederik
>
> --
> Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
>
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>


-- 
Joost Schouppe
OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> |
Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup
<http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/members/97979802/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20201208/4c4bdddc/attachment.htm>


More information about the osmf-talk mailing list