[Osmf-talk] microgrants - second draft policy document

[Simon Poole]

Hi Joost

I would have suggested adding something like "Any purchase or activity
that would be budgeted by the OSMF in the normal course of business" to
the "Examples of ideas unlikely to be accepted", instead of trying to
enumerate (and only partially succeeding) everything that is in the
OSMFs normal remit.

WRT the tools question, the LWG (as has been pointed out every time the
question turns up) simply uses the platform provided by the OSMF and we
would be completely happy to use something else that provides equivalent
collaborative, parallel editing and markup and long term storage with
flexible publication options (with bus factor substantially greater than
one please). It is clearly not in our remit to spend our time hunting
around to find yet another non-integrated, partial solution.

Simon

Am 13.01.2020 um 17:36 schrieb Joost Schouppe:
> Hi,
>
> After community feedback and further board discussion, here is the new
> version of the microrgants policy document:
>
> https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/File:Microgrants_working_document_snapshot_2020-01-13.odt
>
> Please provide feedback before January 28th, so that we can
> potentially look at this at the next Board meeting Jan 30th.
>
> All the best,
> Joost
>
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20200115/a068daa6/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20200115/a068daa6/attachment.sig>