[Osmf-talk] Framework for the foundation's hiring practices

[Craig Allan]

Emile: "oh hell no" is a fair expression of horror!  The buzzword is 
hateful and often mis-applied - but do you hate the general idea of 
pinning routine work and performance assessment down to pre-agreed work 
goals and times? If you're spending other people's money, I hope not.

I fully agree that there are other ways to work. Agile development is 
far looser, allows frequent direction changes and is just far more fun. 
In this case we are not hiring people to do development, we are working 
to reduce risk and improve the resilience of our operations.  In my 
world, Operations are not agile - for good reason.  The proposed Ops 
contractor is there to follow the Standard Operational Procedures to the 
letter, and keep the engines running at 99.999% availability.

In this way our dedicated  SysOps and SysAdmin volunteers are released 
from the daily drudgery of monitoring and maintenance work and can take 
on the more interesting systems development work.
CA


On 2020/05/11 22:42, Emilie Laffray wrote:
> Just a quick "oh hell no" to SMART. It is one of the worth assessment 
> methodology in the tech world.
> This is the bane of my life and you end up creating goals just for the 
> sake of creating goals that are impossible to miss.
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020, 14:15 Craig Allan <allan at iafrica.com 
> <mailto:allan at iafrica.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi All,
>     I was battling to find a short reply to Tobias's request for
>     comments,
>     but Severin has crystallised my thoughts.
>     We are being asked to comment in the absence of specifics which
>     IMHO is
>     not a good approach - I predict it will produce lots of words and
>     very
>     few answers. So here are my words:
>
>     The situation seems to be serious. We are running a world wide
>     network
>     of about 96 servers, using only 4 volunteers as sysadmins. The system
>     is, as far as I know, very heavily used and is only just coping
>     with the
>     loads. So I pause to salute the heroes who keep it all running.
>     Amazing
>     work!
>     I fully support buying some permanent resource to add resilience
>     to the
>     system and take the load off the volunteers.
>
>     I also fully support a lot of the concerns people have posted
>     about the
>     messiness of directly hiring somebody who is going to work for a
>     collective, not work for one manager.  To eliminate a lot of the
>     problems I would support arms-length hiring practice. By that I
>     mean we
>     should be hiring a medium to large company to perform the services.
>     Hiring a company is typically more expensive at first impression, but
>     the extra we will pay to a company rolls up and packages all the
>     legal,
>     labour and human messiness and hidden costs of employing an actual
>     person.
>
>     Hiring a company has the added advantage that it forces us to write a
>     clear SMART job description, forces us to limit the scope of work
>     and it
>     encourages us to do an unemotional assessment of performance against
>     that clear job description.
>
>     I also think that a company performing a set task will be focused
>     on the
>     work, will be less involved in the totality of the OSMF and will have
>     less inclination to mess with our internal politics.
>
>     Craig ALLAN
>
>     * My mapperId is cRaIgalLAn
>     * SMART is an acronym for "Specific, Measurable,Attainable, Relevant,
>     Time-bound"
>
>
>
>     On 2020/05/06 22:24, Tobias Knerr wrote:
>     > Hi all,
>     >
>     > the OSMF Board wants to think about a general framework to hire
>     people
>     > to fill in the gaps that volunteers can't fill. We believe that,
>     given
>     > good practices and firm boundaries, hiring people would be
>     worthwhile.
>     > It could ensure the continued stability of the OSM platform
>     (servers,
>     > integral software) among other things, and augment the currently
>     > overworked volunteers and under resourced efforts in the face of
>     > continued growth.
>     > ...
>     >
>     > Feel free to share your ideas here or send them to
>     board at osmfoundation.org <mailto:board at osmfoundation.org>
>     >
>     >
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     osmf-talk mailing list
>     osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20200511/826a71bc/attachment.htm>