[Osmf-talk] Framework for the foundation's hiring practices

Emilie Laffray emilie.laffray at gmail.com
Mon May 11 20:42:40 UTC 2020


Just a quick "oh hell no" to SMART. It is one of the worth assessment
methodology in the tech world.
This is the bane of my life and you end up creating goals just for the sake
of creating goals that are impossible to miss.

On Mon, May 11, 2020, 14:15 Craig Allan <allan at iafrica.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
> I was battling to find a short reply to Tobias's request for comments,
> but Severin has crystallised my thoughts.
> We are being asked to comment in the absence of specifics which IMHO is
> not a good approach - I predict it will produce lots of words and very
> few answers. So here are my words:
>
> The situation seems to be serious. We are running a world wide network
> of about 96 servers, using only 4 volunteers as sysadmins. The system
> is, as far as I know, very heavily used and is only just coping with the
> loads. So I pause to salute the heroes who keep it all running. Amazing
> work!
> I fully support buying some permanent resource to add resilience to the
> system and take the load off the volunteers.
>
> I also fully support a lot of the concerns people have posted about the
> messiness of directly hiring somebody who is going to work for a
> collective, not work for one manager.  To eliminate a lot of the
> problems I would support arms-length hiring practice. By that I mean we
> should be hiring a medium to large company to perform the services.
> Hiring a company is typically more expensive at first impression, but
> the extra we will pay to a company rolls up and packages all the legal,
> labour and human messiness and hidden costs of employing an actual person.
>
> Hiring a company has the added advantage that it forces us to write a
> clear SMART job description, forces us to limit the scope of work and it
> encourages us to do an unemotional assessment of performance against
> that clear job description.
>
> I also think that a company performing a set task will be focused on the
> work, will be less involved in the totality of the OSMF and will have
> less inclination to mess with our internal politics.
>
> Craig ALLAN
>
> * My mapperId is cRaIgalLAn
> * SMART is an acronym for "Specific, Measurable,Attainable, Relevant,
> Time-bound"
>
>
>
> On 2020/05/06 22:24, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > the OSMF Board wants to think about a general framework to hire people
> > to fill in the gaps that volunteers can't fill. We believe that, given
> > good practices and firm boundaries, hiring people would be worthwhile.
> > It could ensure the continued stability of the OSM platform (servers,
> > integral software) among other things, and augment the currently
> > overworked volunteers and under resourced efforts in the face of
> > continued growth.
> > ...
> >
> > Feel free to share your ideas here or send them to
> board at osmfoundation.org
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20200511/7dae4249/attachment.htm>


More information about the osmf-talk mailing list