[Osmf-talk] openness of disputes / issues

[Pete Masters]

Hi Mario, is it possible to link to original tickets / issues you quote?

Thanks

Pete

On Thu, 28 Jan 2021, 16:03 Mario Frasca, <mario at anche.no> wrote:

> Dear Fellows,
>
> I'm having difficulties with our issue management system, in particular
> the issues we open on the DWG and who's in charge, and what's the status.
>
> some of you may be aware I'm in Panamá, and I made some efforts to
> create a local community of mappers, not particularly successful,
> possibly clumsy.
>
> more recently I tried to obtain support at requiring some minimal
> openness around the YouthMappers Chapter YMUP at the Universidad de
> Panamá, hoping to engage them with the rest of the community.
>
> for this I've opened one issue (and by mistake a second one) with the
> DWG, namely 2020120710000024 (and 2020122210000068) and all I understood
> was that I should not insist.
>
> I know that the YMUP Chapter, or possibly YouthMappers International, or
> maybe Esri, I don't know, but I know that someone has complained about
> my complaints, and I wish to know who, and in what terms.
>
> on January 3rd we had a Zoom meeting (platform was not my choice),
> meeting that derailed, and now our community has the difficult task to
> learn from it, but without having access to the logs.  if I understood
> correctly, an issue to the Foundation was opened on this base, and I
> wonder what is the base.
>
> it's my opinion, but I do not call this a proper handling of issues.
>
> can we **demand** openness?
>
> best regards,
>
> Mario Frasca
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20210128/f0e8a59d/attachment.htm>