[Osmf-talk] openness of disputes / issues

[Mario Frasca]

I wasn't aware that my complaints about secrecy in all surroundings the 
YMUP Chapter was to be considered "private communications" that I 
couldn't expect to make public.

as said, I was informed that some (-one-people-institutions-groups) had 
complained about some of my actions, and I would like to know who that 
was, in what terms they complained, but since it's as you say, that I 
"can't seriously expect that private communication be made public", I am 
not able to tell you how to review those complaints.

I hope to share with others in my same area, also affected by the 
issues, details about the issues, so that they can tell me not to cacare 
il cazzo any more, as you are telling me, if I may speak freely.

Mario Frasca

On 28/01/2021 15:48, Tom Hughes wrote:
> Well you can't seriously expect that private communications
> will be made publicly visible.
>
> You presumably have copies of all communications with you
> so what are you actually hoping to see? The private messages
> of the people that reported you?
>
> Tom
>
> On 28/01/2021 20:39, Mario Frasca wrote:
>> which is the point I hoped to make.
>>
>> Mario
>>
>> On 28/01/2021 15:24, Tom Hughes wrote:
>>> Well it's literally possible but it won't do any good because
>>> only DWG members will be able to see them.
>>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>> On 28/01/2021 20:15, Pete Masters via osmf-talk wrote:
>>>> Hi Mario, is it possible to link to original tickets / issues you 
>>>> quote?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Pete
>>>>
>>>
>
>