[Osmf-talk] Seeking feedback and interest in the OSMF Engineering Working Group

[Edoardo Neerhut]

Which Microgrant program are you referring to? OSMF's or OSGeo Oceania's?

On Mon, 12 Jul 2021, 23:25 Mateusz Konieczny via osmf-talk, <
osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

>
>
>
> Jul 8, 2021, 22:10 by roland.olbricht at gmx.de:
>
> Hi Mateusz,
>
> All code written must be open-source and available without charge.
>
> This should apply also to documentation
> and any other materials produced,
> including reports, funding proposals,
> budget. With exceptions for private data
> in proposals like addresses and bank
> account data.
>
>
> Thank you for pointing this out. I'm one of the people who have asked
> the board to mandate us rebuilding the EWG.
>
> We simply understood open everything as granted and uncontroversial.
>
> I assumed the same, but see Microgrants where making decisions and
> reasoning for selecting specific projects turned out to be secret.
>
> I would prefer to state explicitly that decision making process for funding
> will be public, despite that it has some negative consequences (easier
> to nitpick decisions taken).
>
> Meeting minutes, reasoning for funding
> and everything else also should be public
> (open sourcing here does not make sense
> probably).
>
>
> The more people are involved, the easier it is to have meaningful
> minutes. The EWG is still rather short of people and happy for a helping
> hand.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20210712/0cb08c90/attachment.htm>