[OSRM-talk] Expecting time for osrm-contract for planet

Kieran Caplice kieran.caplice at temetra.com
Thu Sep 21 16:03:26 UTC 2017


We're actually looking for the best of both car and foot, so in my head, 
bicycle would be the happy medium (though I could be completely wrong on 
this).

Kind regards,
Kieran Caplice

On 21/09/17 16:53, Alex Farioletti wrote:
> i've run into the same issues, and now i just use metroextracts of the 
> areas that i need for the bike stuff i do and it reduces the time 
> significantly
>
> *Alex Farioletti*
> *415.312.1674*
> /tcbcourier.com <http://tcbcourier.com> /
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Kieran Caplice 
> <kieran.caplice at temetra.com <mailto:kieran.caplice at temetra.com>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks Daniel.
>
>     I'm using the bicycle profile, so I would expect based on what
>     you've said that somewhere up to 36 hours would be likely.
>     However, this is the current output, after 25h40m:
>
>     [info] Input file: /data/1505492056/planet-latest.osrm
>     [info] Threads: 12
>     [info] Reading node weights.
>     [info] Done reading node weights.
>     [info] Loading edge-expanded graph representation
>     [info] merged 2379332 edges out of 1777752432
>     [info] initializing node priorities... ok.
>     [info] preprocessing 389797971 (90%) nodes...
>     [info] . 10% . 20% . 30% . 40% . 50% . 60%
>
>     It hasn't advanced past 60% in the last 2-3 hours. It is however
>     maxing CPU and using approximately the same amount of RAM since it
>     started.
>
>     Kind regards,
>     Kieran Caplice
>
>     On 21/09/17 16:39, Daniel Patterson wrote:
>>     Hi Kieran,
>>
>>       The contraction time will be slow - many, many hours for the
>>     whole planet.  *Typically* for the car profile it's about 12
>>     hours, but if you use bike or foot, or your own profile, it can
>>     get a lot bigger.
>>
>>       If you've messed with the travel speeds, that can have a big
>>     effect too.  24 hours is not unheard of, but whether it's legit
>>     will depend a lot on the details.
>>
>>     daniel
>>
>>     On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Kieran Caplice
>>     <kieran.caplice at temetra.com <mailto:kieran.caplice at temetra.com>>
>>     wrote:
>>
>>         Hi all,
>>
>>         Could anyone give an approx estimate for the time required to
>>         run the osrm-contract on planet data on a 12 thread, 256 GB
>>         RAM, SSD machine?
>>
>>         The osrm-extract process finished in 232 minutes, but the
>>         contract has now been running solid for 24 hours, and appears
>>         to be stuck at 60% on "preprocessing nodes". All 12 cores are
>>         generally maxed out, and the process is using nearly 90 GB of
>>         RAM.
>>
>>         This is the second time I've run the contract process, as my
>>         SSH connection to the server dropped the first time and the
>>         process wasn't running in a screen etc, so I assumed after
>>         the 40-odd hours it was running for, the connection drop
>>         caused it to hang, but now I'm not so sure. Were there any
>>         files I should maybe have cleared before trying to run it again?
>>
>>         I'm using the docker image to run the command (using
>>         osrm/osrm-backend:latest): time docker run -t -v
>>         /opt/osrm/data:/data osrm/osrm-backend osrm-contract
>>         /data/1505492056/planet-latest.osrm
>>
>>         Kind regards,
>>         Kieran Caplice
>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         OSRM-talk mailing list
>>         OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org>
>>         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>>         <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     OSRM-talk mailing list
>>     OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org>
>>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>>     <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     OSRM-talk mailing list
>     OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>     <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSRM-talk mailing list
> OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/attachments/20170921/f27cc52d/attachment.html>


More information about the OSRM-talk mailing list