[OSRM-talk] Expecting time for osrm-contract for planet
Kieran Caplice
kieran.caplice at temetra.com
Thu Sep 21 16:03:26 UTC 2017
We're actually looking for the best of both car and foot, so in my head,
bicycle would be the happy medium (though I could be completely wrong on
this).
Kind regards,
Kieran Caplice
On 21/09/17 16:53, Alex Farioletti wrote:
> i've run into the same issues, and now i just use metroextracts of the
> areas that i need for the bike stuff i do and it reduces the time
> significantly
>
> *Alex Farioletti*
> *415.312.1674*
> /tcbcourier.com <http://tcbcourier.com> /
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Kieran Caplice
> <kieran.caplice at temetra.com <mailto:kieran.caplice at temetra.com>> wrote:
>
> Thanks Daniel.
>
> I'm using the bicycle profile, so I would expect based on what
> you've said that somewhere up to 36 hours would be likely.
> However, this is the current output, after 25h40m:
>
> [info] Input file: /data/1505492056/planet-latest.osrm
> [info] Threads: 12
> [info] Reading node weights.
> [info] Done reading node weights.
> [info] Loading edge-expanded graph representation
> [info] merged 2379332 edges out of 1777752432
> [info] initializing node priorities... ok.
> [info] preprocessing 389797971 (90%) nodes...
> [info] . 10% . 20% . 30% . 40% . 50% . 60%
>
> It hasn't advanced past 60% in the last 2-3 hours. It is however
> maxing CPU and using approximately the same amount of RAM since it
> started.
>
> Kind regards,
> Kieran Caplice
>
> On 21/09/17 16:39, Daniel Patterson wrote:
>> Hi Kieran,
>>
>> The contraction time will be slow - many, many hours for the
>> whole planet. *Typically* for the car profile it's about 12
>> hours, but if you use bike or foot, or your own profile, it can
>> get a lot bigger.
>>
>> If you've messed with the travel speeds, that can have a big
>> effect too. 24 hours is not unheard of, but whether it's legit
>> will depend a lot on the details.
>>
>> daniel
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Kieran Caplice
>> <kieran.caplice at temetra.com <mailto:kieran.caplice at temetra.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Could anyone give an approx estimate for the time required to
>> run the osrm-contract on planet data on a 12 thread, 256 GB
>> RAM, SSD machine?
>>
>> The osrm-extract process finished in 232 minutes, but the
>> contract has now been running solid for 24 hours, and appears
>> to be stuck at 60% on "preprocessing nodes". All 12 cores are
>> generally maxed out, and the process is using nearly 90 GB of
>> RAM.
>>
>> This is the second time I've run the contract process, as my
>> SSH connection to the server dropped the first time and the
>> process wasn't running in a screen etc, so I assumed after
>> the 40-odd hours it was running for, the connection drop
>> caused it to hang, but now I'm not so sure. Were there any
>> files I should maybe have cleared before trying to run it again?
>>
>> I'm using the docker image to run the command (using
>> osrm/osrm-backend:latest): time docker run -t -v
>> /opt/osrm/data:/data osrm/osrm-backend osrm-contract
>> /data/1505492056/planet-latest.osrm
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Kieran Caplice
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSRM-talk mailing list
>> OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSRM-talk mailing list
>> OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSRM-talk mailing list
> OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSRM-talk mailing list
> OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/attachments/20170921/f27cc52d/attachment.html>
More information about the OSRM-talk
mailing list