[OSRM-talk] Expecting time for osrm-contract for planet
Kieran Caplice
kieran.caplice at temetra.com
Thu Sep 21 16:16:38 UTC 2017
I take back what I said, the contract process has advanced 5%! Looks
like it's now using more RAM than CPU, so I'll give it a bit more time
before judging it prematurely again :-)
Kind regards,
Kieran Caplice
On 21/09/17 17:03, Kieran Caplice wrote:
>
> We're actually looking for the best of both car and foot, so in my
> head, bicycle would be the happy medium (though I could be completely
> wrong on this).
>
> Kind regards,
> Kieran Caplice
>
> On 21/09/17 16:53, Alex Farioletti wrote:
>> i've run into the same issues, and now i just use metroextracts of
>> the areas that i need for the bike stuff i do and it reduces the time
>> significantly
>>
>> *Alex Farioletti*
>> *415.312.1674*
>> /tcbcourier.com <http://tcbcourier.com> /
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Kieran Caplice
>> <kieran.caplice at temetra.com <mailto:kieran.caplice at temetra.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Daniel.
>>
>> I'm using the bicycle profile, so I would expect based on what
>> you've said that somewhere up to 36 hours would be likely.
>> However, this is the current output, after 25h40m:
>>
>> [info] Input file: /data/1505492056/planet-latest.osrm
>> [info] Threads: 12
>> [info] Reading node weights.
>> [info] Done reading node weights.
>> [info] Loading edge-expanded graph representation
>> [info] merged 2379332 edges out of 1777752432
>> [info] initializing node priorities... ok.
>> [info] preprocessing 389797971 (90%) nodes...
>> [info] . 10% . 20% . 30% . 40% . 50% . 60%
>>
>> It hasn't advanced past 60% in the last 2-3 hours. It is however
>> maxing CPU and using approximately the same amount of RAM since
>> it started.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Kieran Caplice
>>
>> On 21/09/17 16:39, Daniel Patterson wrote:
>>> Hi Kieran,
>>>
>>> The contraction time will be slow - many, many hours for the
>>> whole planet. *Typically* for the car profile it's about 12
>>> hours, but if you use bike or foot, or your own profile, it can
>>> get a lot bigger.
>>>
>>> If you've messed with the travel speeds, that can have a big
>>> effect too. 24 hours is not unheard of, but whether it's legit
>>> will depend a lot on the details.
>>>
>>> daniel
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Kieran Caplice
>>> <kieran.caplice at temetra.com <mailto:kieran.caplice at temetra.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Could anyone give an approx estimate for the time required
>>> to run the osrm-contract on planet data on a 12 thread, 256
>>> GB RAM, SSD machine?
>>>
>>> The osrm-extract process finished in 232 minutes, but the
>>> contract has now been running solid for 24 hours, and
>>> appears to be stuck at 60% on "preprocessing nodes". All 12
>>> cores are generally maxed out, and the process is using
>>> nearly 90 GB of RAM.
>>>
>>> This is the second time I've run the contract process, as my
>>> SSH connection to the server dropped the first time and the
>>> process wasn't running in a screen etc, so I assumed after
>>> the 40-odd hours it was running for, the connection drop
>>> caused it to hang, but now I'm not so sure. Were there any
>>> files I should maybe have cleared before trying to run it again?
>>>
>>> I'm using the docker image to run the command (using
>>> osrm/osrm-backend:latest): time docker run -t -v
>>> /opt/osrm/data:/data osrm/osrm-backend osrm-contract
>>> /data/1505492056/planet-latest.osrm
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Kieran Caplice
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OSRM-talk mailing list
>>> OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org>
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>>> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OSRM-talk mailing list
>>> OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org>
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>>> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSRM-talk mailing list
>> OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org <mailto:OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSRM-talk mailing list
>> OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSRM-talk mailing list
> OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/attachments/20170921/727a91ae/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the OSRM-talk
mailing list