[OSRM-talk] Agnostic Map Matching profile

[Mohamad Jarwan]

I have many problems on installing nominatim
can anyone help me to install nominatim on Linux server

i can give him server IP and username,password

thanks

On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:44 AM André Siefken <siefken at geozelot.com> wrote:

> Thx Frédéric for the immediate reply, and sorry for me to take my time
> to respond.
>
> I will rewrite the profiles to test general soft restrictions, however
> my idea here is to have a profile that e.g. strictly uses distance
> between possible matched waypoints to get the overall match.
>
> How would the matching behave if I'd remove all road type based
> restrictions (e.g. vehicle type allowed or not, speed limit, oneways)?
>
> I do see where the algorithm needs certain base variables from the
> network to estimate a likely route, though, and do have problems seeing
> if this is feasonable at all, and I do ask instead of trying because it
> will take me some time to get familiar with profile changes...
>
> André
>
> On 7/9/19 10:14 PM, Frédéric Rodrigo wrote:
> > Le 09/07/2019 à 22:03, André Siefken a écrit :
> >> Hi @all,
> >>
> >> I'm exploring ways to have the matching algorithm work agnostic to
> >> (most) road restrictions and rather 'trust' the trace I pass in.
> >>
> >> I receive continuous GPS locations, with moderate to high resolution in
> >> time, from bikes as well as cabs or buses. It just so happens that some
> >> idiots ride their bikes on roads that OSM (and most laws) thinks they
> >> shouldn't, as well as some cars ignoring bus lane restrictions or buses
> >> leave their lanes. In those cases, matching fails one way or another
> >> ([No match], or only partial matches).
> >>
> >> I have a hard time wrapping my head around if a profile can actually
> >> fullfill restriction and/or even vehicle type (I can easily work with
> >> multiple graphs, though) agnostic matching, which likely implies a
> >> similar agnostic weighting. I imagine a shortest connection/path
> >> matching should do just that, but then I'm at a loss if that is actually
> >> the case and if so, how to generate such a profile.
> >>
> >> Your insights would be much appreciated...
> >>
> >> André
> >
> >
> > I think the weighting is the right think to do. Use high weight on way
> > there is no legal access. It's some kind of soft access restriction.
> > You can even weight the opposite of a one way restriction.
> >
> > But you will have to rework all the samples profiles provided in OSRM.
> >
> >
> > Frédéric.
> >
> >
> --
>
> pgp-key attached
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSRM-talk mailing list
> OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/attachments/20190711/e05c516b/attachment-0001.html>