[Potlatch-dev] What is the Lat-long resolution for Potlatch 2?

[Eugene Alvin Villar]

Ah, that's certainly a better way to ensure the fidelity of node positions.
Thank you very much for clarifying.

Can I assume that the re-projection on each zoom (especially in high-density
areas) won't slow things down? It will be a bit annoying if Potlatch 2 had
to pause for a bit whenever it had to re-compute the projected coordinates
everytime the user zooms in or out.

Thanks,
Eugene


On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net>wrote:

> Potlatch 2 stores unprojected co-ordinates for each node (unlike v1)
> and reprojects on each zoom. So the good news is there's no fixed
> resolution - well, only the limit of precision in ActionScript's
> Number type!
>
> cheers
> Richard
>
> Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry for the blank previous mail.
> >
> > This subject's question is in relation to this thread at Richard's wiki
> talk
> > page:
> >
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:Richard#lat.2Flong_resolution_in_Potlatch
> >
> > I was hoping that in Potlatch 2, the base level will be Level 18, not
> Level
> > 13.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Eugene
> >
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Potlatch-dev mailing list
> Potlatch-dev at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev
>



-- 
http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/potlatch-dev/attachments/20090815/8f71e731/attachment.html>