[openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website] Allow the hiding of changeset tags (#1167)

[Paul Norman]

> I'm really not sure about this - if we allow changeset tags to be hidden then why not node, way and relation tags?

We do need to treat changesets differently, because we can't go back and edit the tags belonging to someone else at a later date. With a normal object with advertising text, we can just edit it to a new version, and the only trace of the text remains in the history.

I'm not sure **this** way is the best, but we shouldn't expect the same approach as nodes, ways, and relations.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/1167#issuecomment-349820132
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/rails-dev/attachments/20171207/cd510d4b/attachment.html>