[openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website] Update Austrian copyright statement (EN). (#1480)

[Thomas Konrad]

@pnorman I agree that this is not optimal, but I didn't set the terms. I'm already trying to convince them to remove that statement from the permission letter, but I don't know if I will succeed.

What irritates me somewhat, however, is that there are some attributions on the [copyright page](https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright), and this specific one gets rejected for a reason not quite clear to me. What sources are these that are on the list? "Important" ones? Who determines whether the source is "important" or not? Or did I miss something here?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/1480#issuecomment-285428970
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/rails-dev/attachments/20170309/16e6f14c/attachment.html>