[openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website] Point at new OSRM demo server (#1637)

Tom Hughes notifications at github.com
Mon Oct 2 08:02:11 UTC 2017


@karussell My logic is that where the routing service being used is the commercial version, with the same routing rules (and potentially additional third party data) then we should name it as what it is, namely the name of the commercial service.

If it's just using the same software but is otherwise independent then I have no problem using the name of the software, as we have been doing with OSM until now.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/1637#issuecomment-333465876
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/rails-dev/attachments/20171002/01530f4a/attachment.html>


More information about the rails-dev mailing list