[openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website] Update NLSFI license (#2580)

ilmaisin notifications at github.com
Thu Apr 30 11:01:51 UTC 2020


> > I think the key question is whether @simonpoole is happy with it?
> @ilmaisin what isn't clear is if we have the waivers from NLS now or not? Aka can the data remain in OSM in the first place? I've re-read the github issues, the FI forum threads and so on, and this still seems to be open.

They basically told me on the telephone and in the e-mail I posted above, that NLS is happy with the situation if the attribution is updated to reflect the current license. In the e-mail they also confirmed that my proposal for the new attribution is okay.

What I am wondering is how do the different anti-DRM clauses in ODbL and CC-BY influence this situation. The old NLS license had no anti-DRM clauses, so that was not a problem back then. If the attribution in osm.org/copyright page means that the users of OSM data for that country need to comply with both licenses, it should be fine, but IANAL.

If it is a hard requirement, I could ask NLS for a waiver to the anti-DRM clause using that waiver template, but I am not sure if they sign it. My understanding is that they would not like to do customer-specific custom licenses.

What also concerns me is that before I got the confirmation from NLS about the attribution issue, they attempted to justify the inclusion of NLS raster in the [editor-layer-index issue](/osmlab/editor-layer-index/issues/769) basically with a lay interpretation of something that is not a directly applicable law. If editor-layer-index is under control of believers in absurd legal theories, it is obviously bad, but probably not directly connected to this issue.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/2580#issuecomment-621763516
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/rails-dev/attachments/20200430/54537863/attachment.htm>


More information about the rails-dev mailing list