[openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website] Label administrative boundaries by real-world designation (PR #5493)

[Minh Nguyễn]

@1ec5 commented on this pull request.



> +        level3: "Administrative Boundary (Level 3)"
+        level4: "Administrative Boundary (Level 4)"
+        level5: "Administrative Boundary (Level 5)"
+        level6: "Administrative Boundary (Level 6)"
+        level7: "Administrative Boundary (Level 7)"
+        level8: "Administrative Boundary (Level 8)"
+        level9: "Administrative Boundary (Level 9)"
+        level10: "Administrative Boundary (Level 10)"
+        level11: "Administrative Boundary (Level 11)"

I noticed that other boundary types don’t say “Boundary”. For example, `boundary=electoral` is just “Electoral”. We could shorten “Administrative Boundary (Level 4)” to just “Administrative (Level 4)”, but I’m ambivalent about similarly truncating the `border_type=*`-based labels, such as “City ~~Boundary~~”. That would easily get confused with the `place=*`-based labels, which follow different criteria.

Another option would be to drop the level suffix, since @tomhughes doesn’t seem enamored with including this information anyways. To the extent that this introduces ambiguity in the search results, the solution would be to tag boundaries with `border_type=*`, which is a good idea anyways.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/5493#discussion_r1912562705
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/5493/review/2545550453 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/rails-dev/attachments/20250112/9aac1c04/attachment.htm>