[Rebuild] [Talk-cz] czech republic: data wrongly marked as ODbL compatible was Re: Hromadné importy & změna licence
Pavel Machek
pavel at ucw.cz
Mon Apr 2 13:18:01 BST 2012
On Mon 2012-04-02 14:05:32, "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]" wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > So lets start by saying that I don't like ODbL and I hate CT.
> >
> > There are three classes of data I uploaded to osm:
> >
> > a) Hand created data, most important paths in the woods. CT+ODbL, is
> > okay for those.
> >
> > b) ODbL compatible - mass imports. CT+ODbL is okay for those, provided
> > data from a) are kept. Richard convinced me that CT is not meant to be
> > evil, and I can live with that.
> >
> > c) ODbL incompatible mass imports. Obviously these need to be
> > removed. I have no power to change this. Mass imports were cities
> > from wikipedia (place=*) and railway stations from around
> >
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/188101
> > 187327
> >
> > I hope this helps, and I'd like to see some reply, thanks,
> >
> > Pavel
>
> Hi,
>
> I admit that I'm pretty confused right now... Are you saying that you've
> changed your mind and are willing to agree to ODbL+CT, except for the
> changesets containing imports of incompatible data? That would be really
> great!
Yes.
> If this is that case, I personally volunteer to help track down your
> changesets containing the incompatible imports.
Thanks!
> The only two are the wikipedia imports of places and railway stations,
> is this correct?
I think so.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
More information about the Rebuild
mailing list