[Rebuild] [Talk-cz] czech republic: data wrongly marked as ODbL compatible was Re: Hromadné importy & změna licence

Pavel Machek pavel at ucw.cz
Mon Apr 2 13:18:01 BST 2012


On Mon 2012-04-02 14:05:32, "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]" wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > So lets start by saying that I don't like ODbL and I hate CT.
> >  
> > There are three classes of data I uploaded to osm:
> >  
> > a) Hand created data, most important paths in the woods. CT+ODbL, is
> > okay for those.
> >  
> > b) ODbL compatible - mass imports. CT+ODbL is okay for those, provided
> > data from a) are kept. Richard convinced me that CT is not meant to be
> > evil, and I can live with that.
> >  
> > c) ODbL incompatible mass imports. Obviously these need to be
> > removed. I have no power to change this. Mass imports were cities 
> > from wikipedia (place=*) and railway stations from around
> > 
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/188101
> > 187327
> > 
> > I hope this helps, and I'd like to see some reply, thanks,
> > 
> > 									Pavel
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I admit that I'm pretty confused right now... Are you saying that you've
> changed your mind and are willing to agree to ODbL+CT, except for the
> changesets containing imports of incompatible data? That would be really
> great!

Yes.

> If this is that case, I personally volunteer to help track down your
> changesets containing the incompatible imports.

Thanks!

> The only two are the wikipedia imports of places and railway stations,
> is this correct?

I think so.
									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html



More information about the Rebuild mailing list