[Rebuild] Approaching final testing

[Kai Krueger]

On 07/06/2012 02:09 PM, Andy Allan wrote:
> On 6 July 2012 20:42, Martijn van Exel <m at rtijn.org> wrote:
>
>> In which 'Redaction 1' is a link to a page that says:
>>
>> =================
>> Showing redaction "foo"
>>
>> Creator: nobody
>>
>> Description:
>> =================
> That's a little bit of lazyness on my end.
>
> When you redact a node, way or a relation you have to refer to a
> redaction object. In testing, I've created one titled "foo" with no
> description. The name of the user account, "nobody", is similarly
> picked at random.
>
> So we need suggestions for
>
> a) the name of the moderator making the redactions, for real. Or one
> of the existing OSM moderators could run the bot, I don't mind.
I would think the redaction bot should be run as its own OSM account and
not under some user's account. This would fit with the general code of
conduct for bots to be run as their own account.

"License change (OdBL) redaction bot" would be one possible name.

An alternative, given that the redaction doesn't have to be owned by the
account submitting the changesets, would be to have an official OSMF
account, which owns the redaction.
> b) A title and suitable description for this moderation event. It's
> the first time we've used the moderation facilities, but it's likely
> to be used again in future.
The description should contain a link to the documentation about the
license change. Probably a good link would be to
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/About_The_License_Change

Kai
>
> Suggestions welcome!
>
> Thanks,
> Andy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rebuild mailing list
> Rebuild at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/rebuild


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/rebuild/attachments/20120706/eeed02a8/attachment.html>