[Routing] Funny gosmore artifact

Lambertus osm at na1400.info
Fri Oct 10 22:17:39 BST 2008


According to [1] and [2], pedestrians aren't allowed on cycleways by 
default (you must add a foot=yes tag specifically). So I guess Gosmore 
is correct by not routing pedestrians using cycleways.

[1] 
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions>
[2] <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway>

Philip Homburg wrote:
> In your letter dated Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:44:30 +0200 you wrote:
>> http://yournavigation.org/?flat=3D52.905788&flon=3D1.055908&tlat=3D53.97889=
>> 9&tlon=3D-1.855469&v=3Dfoot&fast=3D1&layer=3Dmapnik
> 
> Looks like it is just the map that incomplete in that area. 
> 
> Look at the road around King's Lynn
> 
> Note that gosmore doesn't allow you to walk om cyclepaths.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Routing mailing list
> Routing at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/routing






More information about the Routing mailing list