[Routing] Funny gosmore artifact

[Philip Homburg]

In your letter dated Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:17:39 +0200 you wrote:
>According to [1] and [2], pedestrians aren't allowed on cycleways by 
>default (you must add a foot=yes tag specifically). So I guess Gosmore 
>is correct by not routing pedestrians using cycleways.

Consistent, yes. Whether it makes any sense, I don't know. Allowing pedestrians
on trunk roads be not on cycling paths or on a bridleway doesn't make much
sense to me.

For local routing (in .nl), I just use a different elemstyles.xml that does
what I want.

Unfortunately, I can't do that with 'yournavigation.org' until you publish
the source.

Not that there is any hurry. I first want to have a version of gosmore that
does what I want when it comes to oneway and cycling.