[OSM-Science] Feedback needed over the major improvements of "Is OSM up-to-date?"

[Francesco Frassinelli]

 Dear members of OSM Science mailing list,

I am Francesco Frassinelli (FraFra) and I made the "Is OSM up-to-date"
software[1][2], which has been up and running for the last 5 years. Some of
you might remember my presentation at SOTM about "Intrinsic assessment of
the temporal accuracy, up-to-dateness, lineage and thematic accuracy of
OpenStreetMap"[3] or the related paper written together with Marco Minghini
and professor Maria Antonia Brovelli[4].

I made some mayor changes to the web application, which now relies on
Ohsome APIs (thanks to the Ohsome people), and is capable of analysing
wider areas and aggregating nodes.

It would be of *great help* both to my geoinformatics master thesis and to
further development of the project if you could test it and answer a few
questions.
I write here because the software tries to target both OSM users and
researchers as well, by trying providing a simple interface to start the
exploration and analysis of a specific area.

Here is the link to the (short) survey:
https://github.com/frafra/is-osm-uptodate/wiki/Survey-%7C-Sondaggio


Thank you again for your time and guidance,
Best,
Francesco Frassinelli (FraFra)

[1] https://github.com/frafra/is-osm-uptodate
[2] https://is-osm-uptodate.frafra.eu/
[3] https://2018.stateofthemap.org/2018/A17-Intrinsic_assessment_of_the_temporal_accuracy__up-to-dateness__lineage_and_thematic_accuracy_of_OpenStreetMap/

[4]
https://opengeospatialdata.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40965-019-0067-x
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/science/attachments/20220614/c2987142/attachment.htm>