[OSM-Science] Decisions on abstracts submitted to the Academic Track of State of the Map 2022

[Benjamin Herfort]

Hey Yair,

great that this year there is such a high interest in the Academic track.

Could you clarify again the differences between full / lightning talks.

I'm not sure if this information is already available somewhere else, 
but how "long" are these exactly?

Best regards,

Benni

On 29.06.22 15:04, Yair Grinberger wrote:
> Dear Colleagues and Friends,
>
> We were very excited to receive an exceptionally high number of 
> submissions to this year's Academic Track - thank you to all those who 
> have submitted their work! As the number of high quality submissions 
> was greater than the number of time slots available, we decided to 
> accept some of the abstracts as full talks, some as lightning talks, 
> and some as posters.
> If you submitted an abstract to the track, you should have received an 
> email earlier today with our decision and further instructions (if 
> relevant). In case you did not receive it, please check your spam 
> folder and/or let us know.
> We do ask that the authors of all abstracts accepted for an oral 
> presentation (full/lightning) will confirm their participation as soon 
> as possible, so we will be able to go ahead and publish the schedule 
> for the Track.
>
> We are looking forward to seeing you in Florence or virtually during 
> the track and we encourage those of you who are not presenting to join 
> us (Both in-person and virtual tickets are still  available at 
> https://2022.stateofthemap.org/tickets/)
>
> Best wishes,
> The Scientific Committee - Levente, Marco, Hao, Pengyuan, & Yair
>
> _______________________________________________
> Science mailing list
> Science at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/science