[Strategic] The workload of OSMF
shfeldman at gmail.com
Wed May 11 12:08:55 BST 2011
Sometimes you can't see the wood for the trees and that could be where Strategic could offer some perspective for example
m: +44 (0) 7958 924 101
On 11 May 2011, at 12:00, strategic-request at openstreetmap.org wrote:
> Send Strategic mailing list submissions to
> strategic at openstreetmap.org
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> strategic-request at openstreetmap.org
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> strategic-owner at openstreetmap.org
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Strategic digest..."
> Today's Topics:
> 1. The workload of OSMF (Steven Feldman)
> 2. Re: The workload of OSMF (Frederik Ramm)
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 08:37:25 +0100
> From: Steven Feldman <shfeldman at gmail.com>
> To: strategic at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: [Strategic] The workload of OSMF
> Message-ID: <3ED4539A-02B5-4D7B-9294-25BE031041F0 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> You have probably seen this on osm-talk
> The OpenStreetMap Foundation board announced today the resignation of
> Emilie Laffray.
> Full announcement
> Jo Walsh commented:
> Glancing over the OSMF board meeting minutes - meeting weekly, find that amazing. For other technical foundation boards, monthly is pretty frequent. OKF board meets quarterly... So it strikes me you on the board are doing a fantastic amount of work to keep OSM(F) running - many tasks that in similar contexts, people are paid to do. OKF recently hired a part-time person to help deal with administratve burden, keep track of projects and working groups, could OSMF think about the same / about revenue models to support that?
> Should this be a subject for discussion in SWG?
> Steven Feldman
> KnowWhere Consulting
> m: +44 (0) 7958 924 101
> w: knowwhere
> t: @StevenFeldman
> skype: stevenfeldman2638
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/strategic/attachments/20110511/966e62b3/attachment-0001.html>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 10:06:44 +0200
> From: Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org>
> To: strategic at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Strategic] The workload of OSMF
> Message-ID: <4DCA4394.4060007 at remote.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> On 05/11/11 09:37, Steven Feldman wrote:
>> Jo Walsh commented:
>> Glancing over the OSMF board meeting minutes - meeting weekly, find
>> that amazing. For other technical foundation boards, monthly is
>> pretty frequent. OKF board meets quarterly...
> I think Jo is right, and from what an outsider can see, the weekly OSMF
> board meetings seem to consist largely of going through an agenda,
> finding that there's no change, and re-scheduling the issue for next time ;)
> It seems to me that there is some organisational problem in how OSMF
> board works. I'm not assigning any blame or saying someone does
> something wrong - I have only the information available from the
> minutes, and it seems that there's a disparity between the frequent
> meetings and the assumed toll that takes on OSMF members' free time and
> what comes out of it.
> But if this assessment is correct, then it is fundamentally an OSMF
> board problem that can only be solved by OSMF board. It might be
> possible that a part-time hire could help, but it is OSMF board that
> would need to step up and say: Here, we have this problem, and we've
> decided to hire someone to help.
> If it comes to un-elected working groups debating how to help the
> elected OSMF board do their job better because OSMF board cannot fix
> themselves on their own then I think we really have a problem. In that
> case, OSMF board shold resign completely, and SWG should ask to be
> elected board ;)
> Strategic mailing list
> Strategic at openstreetmap.org
> End of Strategic Digest, Vol 12, Issue 8
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Strategic