[Tagging] [OSM-talk] Path vs footway vs cycleway vs...

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Tue Dec 1 00:09:36 GMT 2009

2009/12/1 Steve Bennett <stevagewp at gmail.com>

> I've referred to "Jurisdictions" a few times for this reason. I imagine US
> states are possibly even more individual. Would we go as far as
> councils/municipalities? Probably not. (Although, as I mentioned somewhere
> earlier, the City of Melbourne prohibits bike riding in parks, while other
> councils don't. My preferred solution would be tag paths in the former as
> footway, and in the latter as cycleway).
> no, I wouldn't tag all ways in a park as cycleways, just because you can
also ride a bike. I would tag both as footway (or service if big enough for
cars to drive, with access-tags) and put bicycle=yes/no aside, as long as
they are not dedicated cycleways.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20091201/3acb52a3/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list