[Tagging] bicycle=no

[James Livingston]

On 05/12/2009, at 4:14 AM, Anthony wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Matthias Julius <lists at julius-net.net> wrote:
> I guess it is implied that when you are not allowed to carry a bike
> you are not allowed to ride it neither.
> 
> True, but when I tag bicycle=no, I don't intend to imply anything about whether or not you are allowed to "carry" a bike.  It may be allowed.  It may not be allowed.

I'd hope that bicycle=no would have the same implications for having a bicycle without riding it as other *=no tags would for their transports. For example I would guess that where horse=no is used, you often can't walk your horse as well as not riding it. So maybe having a separate tag for things which are not allowed (e.g. prohibited=bicycle;horse;explosives) could be the way to go.

Throwing out some more random examples, there are tunnels which have "no explosives to be taken into this tunnel, trucks with those detour that way ->" signs.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20091206/6ca2df4c/attachment.html>