deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com
Sun Dec 6 07:17:05 GMT 2009
2009/12/6 James Livingston <doctau at mac.com>:
> I'd hope that bicycle=no would have the same implications for having a
> bicycle without riding it as other *=no tags would for their transports. For
> example I would guess that where horse=no is used, you often can't walk your
> horse as well as not riding it. So maybe having a separate tag for things
> which are not allowed (e.g. prohibited=bicycle;horse;explosives) could be
> the way to go.
erm, wouldn't horse=prohibited be closer to current usage, eg horse=no.... ?
More information about the Tagging