[Tagging] bicycle=no

Andre Engels andreengels at gmail.com
Tue Dec 8 10:37:28 GMT 2009

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Roy Wallace <waldo000000 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Definitely a step in the right direction, i.e. separating "legal
> status" from "defacto status".
> I'd be tempted to also use bicycle:signed=yes/no to clarify when the
> (legal?) status is derived from evidence on the ground as opposed to a
> law book.

Sounds unnecessary to me - How many roads and paths have their status
defined in the law book?

André Engels, andreengels at gmail.com

More information about the Tagging mailing list