[Tagging] bicycle=no

Roy Wallace waldo000000 at gmail.com
Tue Dec 8 10:57:26 GMT 2009

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Andre Engels <andreengels at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Roy Wallace <waldo000000 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Definitely a step in the right direction, i.e. separating "legal
>> status" from "defacto status".
>> I'd be tempted to also use bicycle:signed=yes/no to clarify when the
>> (legal?) status is derived from evidence on the ground as opposed to a
>> law book.
> Sounds unnecessary to me - How many roads and paths have their status
> defined in the law book?

Isn't this what Mike was referring to when he said "... access to
non-copyright information on legal status ... is reasonably available
in the public domain in England and Wales" ?

Andre are you saying that bicycle=yes/no should *only* be used when
there is a corresponding sign on the ground?

More information about the Tagging mailing list